Webinar Review: Optimizing Lab Performance Through Casework and Furniture
Laboratory casework and furniture are often treated as background elements—necessary, but secondary to equipment and technology. The panel discussion webinar “Optimizing Lab Performance through Casework and Furniture,” part of Lab Design’s 2026 Casework & Furniture Digital Conference, made a compelling case that these foundational components are, in fact, central to long-term laboratory success. Featuring Don Bush, Moray Newton, Jon Davies, and Mike Mulvey of HKS, the session delivered a nuanced, experience-driven exploration of how thoughtful furniture selection can shape safety, flexibility, and overall performance.
From the outset, the panel emphasized that casework is not just another line item in the design process—it is the backbone of the lab environment. As one speaker noted during the discussion, equipment may evolve over time, but casework decisions made early on will define how effectively a lab functions for years, if not decades. This theme of long-term thinking—balancing immediate needs with future adaptability—was woven throughout the conversation.
This webinar, along with the other webinars in the Casework & Furniture Digital Conference, is available for free on demand viewing. Click here to view this webinar.
Flexibility vs. permanence: a strategic tradeoff
One of the most engaging aspects of the discussion was the ongoing tension between fixed and modular casework systems. The panelists highlighted how the industry has largely shifted toward mobile systems, particularly in commercial and research environments. “At this time, the commercial lab market has moved almost entirely towards mobile systems while institutions and teaching labs still primarily utilize fixed casework,” says Mike Mulvey, senior laboratory planner and vice president at HKS.
This distinction underscores a key takeaway: there is no one-size-fits-all solution. Research labs, where workflows and equipment change rapidly, benefit from modular systems that can be reconfigured with minimal disruption. In contrast, teaching labs often prioritize durability and simplicity, making fixed casework a more practical choice.
However, flexibility comes at a cost—both financial and logistical. Don Bush, regional director, life science and principal at HKS, notes that while mobile systems offer long-term adaptability, they require a higher upfront investment. Owners must weigh this against the potential cost of future renovations, making lifecycle planning a critical part of the decision-making process.
Material selection: function first, aesthetics second
Materiality sparked one of the more thought-provoking exchanges in the panel. The conversation moved beyond basic durability considerations to explore cultural differences and user perceptions. While US-based labs may incorporate wood or laminate elements for warmth and visual appeal, European practices tend to favor more utilitarian, chemically resistant materials.
Jon Davies, studio practice leader, life science and vice president at HKS, reinforces the importance of performance-driven material selection, particularly in environments involving chemical exposure. “Although melamine is a lower first-cost solution—and might be found at student workstations or outside the lab—in the long-term, environments involving chemicals require materials with chemical resistance,” he says. He further emphasizes the importance of adhering to established guidelines: “Whatever materials you are evaluating for lab design, it is critical to refer to SEFA (Scientific Equipment and Furniture Association) Standards for guidelines on chemical resistance.”
Ultimately, the panel agrees that material decisions should be driven first by function—chemical resistance, cleanability, and durability—while still allowing room for thoughtful aesthetic enhancements that support user well-being.
Ergonomics, accessibility, and the human factor
A particularly valuable portion of the discussion focused on ergonomics and accessibility—areas that are gaining increasing importance in modern lab design. Rather than treating accessibility as a compliance requirement, the panel framed it as an integral part of creating inclusive, high-performing environments.
Mulvey highlights a significant industry shift: “What we’re seeing is accessibility becoming the baseline for lab design rather than the exception.” This evolution reflects broader changes in both regulatory expectations and workplace culture.
The panel explores practical challenges, such as bench height, reach ranges, and the feasibility of adjustable systems. While fully adjustable casework offers the greatest flexibility, it is often constrained by budget limitations—particularly in academic settings. As a result, design teams must carefully balance universal design principles with project-specific constraints.
Importantly, the discussion acknowledged that no solution can accommodate every scenario perfectly. Instead, the goal is to engage stakeholders early, evaluate real-world use cases, and arrive at a consensus that maximizes usability for the greatest number of users.
Workflow efficiency and spatial optimization
Beyond individual workstations, the panelists emphasized the role of casework in shaping overall workflow. Thoughtful layout and customization can significantly reduce inefficiencies, improve safety, and enhance user satisfaction.
Key strategies discussed included:
Optimizing bench depth based on equipment requirements (typically around 30 inches in the US)
Minimizing clutter through smart cable management and overhead service integration
Reducing reliance on upper shelving to improve accessibility and visibility
Davies also addresses power distribution and visual clutter, noting that while overhead services support flexibility, they require careful planning to avoid obstructing the workspace. Solutions such as bundling cables or using reagent racks for routing can help strike a balance between functionality and aesthetics.
Maintenance, longevity, and the cost of value engineering
Another critical theme was the importance of durability and maintenance. The panel cautioned against the pitfalls of value engineering—cutting costs upfront at the expense of long-term performance.
As Mulvey and his colleagues note, selecting high-quality components—from drawer slides to hinges—can significantly extend the lifespan of casework and reduce maintenance costs. Conversely, lower-quality materials may lead to frequent repairs and operational disruptions.
The discussion also highlighted the need for ongoing maintenance programs, including proper cleaning protocols and routine inspections. These considerations are often overlooked during design but are essential for preserving performance over time.
Designing for change: future-proofing the laboratory
Perhaps the most forward-looking aspect of the panel was its focus on adaptability. Laboratories are evolving faster than ever, driven by advances in technology, automation, and research methodologies. Casework must be able to keep pace.
Interestingly, the panel noted that emerging trends like AI have not yet significantly impacted casework design. As Davies observes, “There has been no real impact on design yet. Ultimately, automation will change the amount of benching needed, but not the type or style of benching for lab workers.” This suggests that while the tools of science may evolve, the fundamental principles of workspace design remain consistent.
Still, the need for flexibility is undeniable. Whether through modular systems, adaptable layouts, or durable materials, future-proofing is about creating environments that can evolve without requiring complete overhauls.
Watch on demand
This panel discussion offers a comprehensive and practical look at the often-overlooked role of casework and furniture in laboratory design. By drawing on decades of experience across diverse project types, the speakers provide actionable insights that resonate with both lab users and design professionals.
The key takeaway is clear: casework is not just infrastructure—it is a strategic investment. When approached thoughtfully, it can enhance safety, improve workflows, support accessibility, and extend the life of the laboratory itself.
For anyone involved in planning or renovating a lab, this session serves as a valuable reminder that the details matter—and that the right decisions at the foundation level can have a lasting impact on performance and success.
